Money has been turned into a political weapon to silence journalists, activists, and civil society by freezing assets, blocking accounts, sanctioning, and banning payments.
This is what financial censorship looks like.
When you donate to a cause, pay a lawyer, or buy a bus ticket to a protest, you are doing something that looks like spending money but is actually closer to free speech. Governments understand this, which is why cutting someone off from the banking system is such a powerful tool of repression. Without a bank account, you cannot pay rent, verify your identity, or fund a legal defence. Sometimes a court order is the instrument. Often, none is required at all. It is censorship, just quieter than most.
You can't pay for buses, gas, venues, or travel. Without the ability to fund collective action, the right to assemble exists only on paper.
You can't show what you value when every payment is watched. Every transaction is a statement. Every statement can be used against you.
You can't fund the organisations that defend everyone else. Cut the funding, and the defence collapses — without a single arrest.
No cases match the current filters.
Know a case that isn't here? See a case that shouldn't be here?
In 2021, Russia designated Navalny's regional political network as terrorist-linked — placing it on the same financial watchlist as al-Qaeda and ISIS — and declared the Anti-Corruption Foundation an extremist organisation, triggering automatic exclusion from the banking system. Conventional fundraising became dangerous. Bitcoin provided the margin. Approximately 675 BTC — roughly 10% of total funding — moved through channels no government desk could reach. That is not a large share. But when every other channel is frozen or watched, a 10% lifeline is the difference between an organisation that can pay its staff and one that cannot.
No single entity can be pressured to freeze your self-custodied wallet and the bitcoin in it. Bitcoin runs across tens of thousands of independent nodes worldwide, so there is no off switch, no compliance department, and no government desk to call.
No application, no KYC, and no compliance officer. Anyone with internet access can receive funds from a journalist in Belarus to an activist in Tehran.
Works across borders without correspondent banking. A supporter in Oslo can fund a journalist in Minsk, instantly, without asking permission from the financial systems of either country.
The current financial system is not a neutral arbiter. It is a walled garden with gatekeepers who make political decisions about who may participate. The people who pay the price for those decisions are not criminals. They are the people in this dataset.
Note: open payment systems can be misused — for terrorism, ransomware, and worse. So can cash, the internet, and cars. The question is whether restricting the tool stops the harm or merely inconveniences it while foreclosing its legitimate uses. That question applies here as elsewhere.
The infrastructure exists, but it requires skill to use safely. Self-custody means no bank account stands between you and your funds — but it also means no bank account to blame if something goes wrong. The knowledge takes time to acquire. The time to acquire it is before the account gets frozen.
Every organisation in this dataset had a bank account until the moment it did not. Setting up a parallel payment channel before a crisis is the difference between continuity and collapse. The technical setup is fast; building donor familiarity takes longer. BTCPay Server is a self-hosted starting point that puts no intermediary between an organisation and its funding.
Adopting bitcoin as a funding channel creates an obligation of transparency. An organisation that receives bitcoin without accounting for it publicly gives critics an easy target. Tools like Clams make the ledger legible to donors, auditors, and the public.
Financial censorship works partly because it is invisible. A bank closure generates no headline, no arrest record, no court filing. The only counter to invisibility is documentation. If you witness or experience financial censorship, record it — and submit it here.
The infrastructure in this section exists because people funded its development. It remains open and censorship-resistant because they continue to do so. The organisations doing this work, including OpenSats and the Human Rights Foundation, depend on donations to keep it that way.